Hoi, In an alternate universe maybe. Thanks, GerardM
Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com
I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually has native speakers.
On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ? Thanks, GerardM
On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which artificial languages should be eligible?
Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately after Esperanto.
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom