I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually has native speakers.

On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:

Hoi,

We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?

Thanks,

     GerardM

On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <millosh@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which artificial
> languages should be eligible?

Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
after Esperanto.

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom