Hoi,' and you have it on good authority that there are native speakers of Klingon? Who are you fooling. At that, you are insulting. Thanks, GerardM
On 9 December 2017 at 17:10, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose you have strong evidence that LFN has more native speakers than Klingon or you are just an ordinary liar?
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, In an alternate universe maybe. Thanks, GerardM
Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com
I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually
has
native speakers.
On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi, We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ? Thanks, GerardM
On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com
wrote:
Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which
artificial
languages should be eligible?
Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately after Esperanto.
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom