Hoi,'
and you have it on good authority that there are native speakers of
Klingon? Who are you fooling. At that, you are insulting.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 9 December 2017 at 17:10, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I suppose you have strong evidence that LFN has more
native speakers
than Klingon or you are just an ordinary liar?
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
In an alternate universe maybe.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>
>
> I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually
has
> native speakers.
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which
artificial
> > languages should be eligible?
>
> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
> after Esperanto.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom