As I wrote on 23 August 2005, 12:57 at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comments/Cswiki_issues, Mr Vrba arbitrarily, for no clear violation of rules, bans many users, that's why he should be *immediately* desysopped. Unfortunately, no action was taken and he continues in his behaviour: He pressed me not to edit my second home page under pain of banning me and last days he even banned me forever. He has written this reason: "Důvod "nechce psat encyklopedii, ale provokovat ostatni".. " which means: "He doesn't wish to write the encyclopedia, but to provoke others." This I deny. I used my altnernative account (http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedista:Z) not to "provoke" others by using my ordinary account (http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedista:V%C3%ADt_Zv%C3%A1novec). As a result of mediation with Mr. Pospíšil and Malý čtenář I very limited my edits of dissusion pages. But to no avail.
Mr. Vrba ignores consequences of his actions. He wrote: "If somebody share with him IP address, it vexes me, but nothing can be done." He lied. He had known very well that he blocked my second account, I personally called his attention to that and he signed his knowledge of this. It doesn't matter too much sharing
IP address (I know how to bypass it), but the fact I cannot violate Sock puppet policy. Everything could be done, RfC, anything. Not to unilaterarily ban me forever.
After that I was charged with many other wikicrimes. Since I am banned forever I was denied right to defend myself. Therefore I present my defence at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:V%C3%ADt_Zv%C3%A1novec/My_defence
Since the Czech sysops are intimidated not to unblock me (Tom Pecina was already proposed to be desysopped for unblocking me), interference of someone not connected with cs: is heavy needed.
Yours truly, Vít Zvánovec
On 9/6/05, Vít Zvánovec Zvanovec.Vit@cmkos.cz wrote:
As I wrote on 23 August 2005, 12:57 at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comments/Cswiki_issues, Mr Vrba arbitrarily, for no clear violation of rules, bans many users, that's why he should be *immediately* desysopped. Unfortunately, no action was taken and he continues in his behaviour:
(...)
Since the Czech sysops are intimidated not to unblock me (Tom Pecina was already proposed to be desysopped for unblocking me), interference of someone not connected with cs: is heavy needed.
As a Steward, I state that we do not take actions on requests of single persons, but only at the request of communities. Unless you can show me evidence that your request is carried by a broader group within the Czech Wikipedia, I will not take any action, and I am quite convinced that my colleagues have the same opinion on this.
Andre Engels
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org