The Board's role is not to interfere in user
I don't consider this is the user dispute. The problem is more
serious. In my
opinion there's no edit war with me. The problem lies in behaviour. There are
repeated personal attacs & injuries towards me never punished and I am
repeatedly banned for no clear reason, last time for indefinitive period.
Two members of the Board, myself and Anthere, have
already commented on this
matter, on Meta, but in our position as members of the community, not as
members of the Board.
Yes, but this was just a part of the problem: my desyssoping
after one year
long successful term. Now it is another question: banning of mine.
The Czech Wikipedia has 14 admins, which seems to me
enough people to watch
over each other's actions and reverse unfair blocks if those occur.
Yes, but -jkb-, Dodo, Mormegil, Radouch, and Vrba are directly involved in
the case as the opposite side.
Daniel Mayer is a foreigner with no contributions (
Ludek, Mojza, Michal Jurosz, Miroslav MALOVEC, and Wikimol are not active at
all or just a little.
I consider Karakal, Malýčtenář, Tompecina as my friends and they would be
endangered by -jkb- and his non-sysop allies if they did something for me. For
example, Tompecina unbanned me after a few days, but I was immediately banned
again (with no edits meanwhile) a Tompecina was warned that if he did it again,
he would be desyssoped.
I don't see what the Board could do if the
community there has decided that
you should be de-adminned or blocked.
Reverse this decission.
Do you have dispute resolution mechanisms in place on
Is there another user you trust who could try to
mediate for you?
Yes, there was attempts to mediate:
1. by Jan Pospíšil. It was not accepted by the opposite site.
2. by Karalal. I think it won't be accepted by the opposite site as well. The
reason I cannot tell publicly.
3. by Wikimol. It was rejected by the opposite site.