It seems that the controversial bits have been moved to /Talk, and I think that's appropriate. I know virtually nothing of Tony Blair, but I would agree that a sentence reading "...may have fooled some of the population..." takes a stand that isn't appropriate for Wikipedia.

A rewritten version might read "Critics claim that Blair's rebranding strategy was superficial, and that his fundamental politics actually remain the same" or some such.

Gareth Owen wrote:

To me, the Tony Blair article (http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki.cgi?Tony_Blair) is horribly biased, but I can't trust my instincts since I'm a moderate supporter of some of his policies.

Can someone from outside the UK offer an opinion on its NeutralPointOfView.

Cheers

Gareth Owen [Wikipedia-l] To manage your subscription to this list, please go here: http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l