It seems that the controversial bits have been moved to /Talk, and I think that's
appropriate. I know virtually nothing of Tony Blair, but I would agree that a
sentence reading "...may have fooled some of the population..." takes a stand
that
isn't appropriate for Wikipedia.
A rewritten version might read "Critics claim that Blair's rebranding strategy
was
superficial, and that his fundamental politics actually remain the same" or some
such.
Gareth Owen wrote:
To me, the Tony Blair article
(
http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki.cgi?Tony_Blair)
is horribly biased, but I can't trust my instincts since I'm a moderate
supporter of some of his policies.
Can someone from outside the UK offer an opinion on its NeutralPointOfView.
Cheers
--
Gareth Owen
[Wikipedia-l]
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
*************************************************
*
http://www.nupedia.com/ *
* The Ever Expanding Free Encyclopedia *
*************************************************