Thomas Koll's reply: probably a sample of german totalitarian fuzzy logic
He contends to have read half an hour in my website and now diagnoses me as having 'paranoia' - whatever that may be.
'Logic': This procedure has got nothing to do with it. He is arguing around my arguments. My arguments were, in a nutshell: Both the individuals named (cf my original message) boast as human-rights specialists. Practise has shown that they seem very choosy whom to attribute these rights, when they have been violated. Human rights are, however, indivisible by nature. In other words, they are probably high-ranking conmen, and the public has a right to know about that. A link to a critical website would accomplish the balance that now is lost, due to their partisan self-depiction.
Calling people 'psychiatric' names is the first step towards treating them like that - think of the defunct Soviet Union, and remember who was right and who was wrong. Remember also that our politicians then would protest regularly against this kind of human-rights abuses. Today, acting like former soviet apparatchiks has become our own politicians' daily fare.
I would prefer the anglo-saxon community dealing with this issue. I have tried the german conflict-solving layer already and know that there is nothing to be expected.
Over.
Am 22.01.2006 um 17:59 schrieb Michael Laudahn:
Thomas Koll's reply: probably a sample of german totalitarian fuzzy logic
obviously you didn't read my biography...
He contends to have read half an hour in my website and now diagnoses me as having 'paranoia' - whatever that may be.
I don't diagnose, I'm a informatics student not a psychologist. Btw, not only totalitarism and ignorance for social matters in the own country is a German habit but also Querulantentum ;-)
'Logic': This procedure has got nothing to do with it. He is arguing around my arguments. My arguments were, in a nutshell: Both the individuals named (cf my original message) boast as human-rights specialists. Practise has shown that they seem very choosy whom to attribute these rights, when they have been violated. Human rights are, however, indivisible by nature. In other words, they are probably high-ranking conmen, and the public has a right to know about that.
As Ströbele already wrote, you don't deliver enough details, just complaining about helicopters and Zoll-boats is really not enough for deciding wether or not to take a lawsuit.
A link to a critical website would accomplish the balance that now is lost, due to their partisan self-depiction.
Calling people 'psychiatric' names is the first step towards treating them like that - think of the defunct Soviet Union, and remember who was right and who was wrong.
communism is a good thing, sadly in theory only.
I would prefer the anglo-saxon community dealing with this issue. I have tried the german conflict-solving layer already and know that there is nothing to be expected.
at least dropping a note on wikide-l would be nice because I doubt that the anglo-saxon here have enough knowledge of German language to understand all you website.
ciao, tom
-- http://www.tomk32.de - just a geek trying to change the world http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:TomK32 http://verlag.tomk32.de/c/wrdigest
Michael Laudahn wrote:
I would prefer the anglo-saxon community dealing with this issue. I have tried the german conflict-solving layer already and know that there is nothing to be expected.
Over.
Hi
The anglo-saxon community may be primarily found at wikien-l@wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you want to talk to germans, please focus on the german mailing list. This list may not be the appropriate forum.
Thanks
Ant
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org