Am 22.01.2006 um 17:59 schrieb Michael Laudahn:
Thomas Koll's reply: probably a sample of german
obviously you didn't read my biography...
He contends to have read half an hour in my website
diagnoses me as
having 'paranoia' - whatever that may be.
I don't diagnose, I'm a informatics student not a psychologist.
Btw, not only totalitarism and ignorance for social matters in
the own country is a German habit but also Querulantentum ;-)
'Logic': This procedure has got nothing to do
with it. He is
my arguments. My arguments were, in a nutshell: Both the
(cf my original message) boast as human-rights specialists.
Practise has shown that they seem very choosy whom to attribute
these rights, when they have been violated. Human rights are,
however, indivisible by nature. In other words, they are probably
high-ranking conmen, and the public has a right to know about that.
As Ströbele already wrote, you don't deliver enough details, just
helicopters and Zoll-boats is really not enough for deciding wether
or not to
take a lawsuit.
A link to a critical website would accomplish the
balance that now
is lost, due to their partisan self-depiction.
Calling people 'psychiatric' names is the first step towards
like that - think of the defunct Soviet Union, and remember who was
and who was wrong.
communism is a good thing, sadly in theory only.
I would prefer the anglo-saxon community dealing with
this issue. I
have tried the german conflict-solving layer already and know that
there is nothing to be expected.
at least dropping a note on wikide-l would be nice because I
doubt that the anglo-saxon here have enough knowledge of
German language to understand all you website.
- just a geek trying to change the world