From: "Gareth Owen" <wiki(a)gwowen.freeserve.co.uk>
Larry Sanger <lsanger(a)nupedia.com> writes:
Why should we revert to an inferior technology
just to save you a little
convenience?
Can someone please explain, from the perspective of a user and contributor
rather than a software engineer, why the old wiki technology is considered
(by some) to have been inferior?
I don't think Larry meant it from a software-engineering point of view,
because from that point of view it doesn't make much difference. He probably
meant it from a management point-of-view where inferior technology means
that it promotes unwanted types of articles.
On an unrelated *cough* note:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Fatal error: Call to undefined function:
array_key_exists() in
/home/wiki-newest/work-http/special_recentchanges.php on line 152
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
That's because Jimbo was running an older version of PHP. Inferior
technology, if you will. :-) I don't see the error now so I assume he has
updated it.
-- Jan Hidders