Larry Sanger <lsanger(a)nupedia.com> writes:
Why should we revert to an inferior technology just to
save you a little
convenience?
Can someone please explain, from the perspective of a user and contributor
rather than a software engineer, why the old wiki technology is considered
(by some) to have been inferior?
On an unrelated *cough* note:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: array_key_exists() in
/home/wiki-newest/work-http/special_recentchanges.php on line 152
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Gareth Owen
"Wikipedia does rock. By the count on the "brilliant prose" page, there
are 14 not-bad articles so far" -- Larry Sanger (12 Jan 2001)