Members,

I have a number of pages that were cut/pastes ...but from documents written by myself. This covers Japanese Language, Linear algebra, Mathematical Groups, parts of the ADA (the rest of public law) and more. These are subjects that I would not be happy just tossing up. I don't think anyone should remove a page, until they can show it was a cut/paste from someone else, not free domain. Further this is an administrators' job, it would seem. I think members should report such problems to an administrator.

I find this whole post insulting, whether you are referring to my work or not.

As Ever,

Ruth Ifcher

--

hi all.

I have a bit of a moral dilemma here: some articles on wikipedia seem to pop-up non-wikified and written slightly 'too well'. It seems obvious that it is a copy/paste job from another source. What should we/I do in such a case? Delete it? It could be from a free source or someone's work for work/uni/school that he just wishes to share with the community... Plz help me out on this one.

regards

WojPob

ps. who subscribes to this list anyway? could mailman give us a list of members?

---

Wojciech Pobratyn Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien mailto:wojciech.pobratyn@wu-wien.ac.at

"In his house at R'lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming" H.P. Lovecraft

"Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle and quick to anger"

[Wikipedia-l] To manage your subscription to this list, please go here: http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l