Members,
I have a number of pages that were
cut/pastes ...but from documents written by myself. This
covers Japanese Language, Linear algebra, Mathematical
Groups, parts of the ADA (the rest of public law) and
more.
These are subjects that I would not be happy just
tossing up. I don't think anyone should remove a page,
until they can show it was a cut/paste from someone
else, not free domain. Further this is an
administrators' job, it would seem. I think members
should report such problems to an administrator.
I find this whole post insulting, whether you are
referring to my work or not.
As Ever,
Ruth Ifcher
--
hi all.
I have a bit of a moral dilemma here: some articles on wikipedia seem to
pop-up non-wikified and written slightly 'too well'. It seems obvious that
it is a copy/paste job from another source. What should we/I do in such a
case? Delete it? It could be from a free source or someone's work for
work/uni/school that he just wishes to share with the community... Plz help
me out on this one.
regards
WojPob
ps. who subscribes to this list anyway? could mailman give us a list of
members?
----
Wojciech Pobratyn
Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien
mailto:wojciech.pobratyn@wu-wien.ac.at
"In his house at R'lyeh dead Cthulhu waits dreaming"
H.P. Lovecraft
"Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle and quick to
anger"
[Wikipedia-l]
To manage your subscription to this list, please go here:
http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l