Timwi schreef:
9 links! ;-) In Wikipedia, you get less links per
sentence because in an
encyclopedia the links should go to articles that are relevant to the
context. In a dictionary, the links just go to words, so theoretically
you could link absolutely every word! (Of course, I don't think every
word should be linked, but just about every word that someone might
conceivably want to look up. Someone unfamiliar with taxonomy might want
to look up "species", "family" and "genus" in the above.)
Why should not every word be a link? We could change the stylesheet to
leave links the same a text, and automatically let every word be a link,
without necessity for the [[syntax]]. Names could redirect to the
Wikipedia, and it would make editing easier. After all, each word
deserves an entry... what do you think?
BTW, I agree with the original poster about the Wiktionairy problem.
Gerrit.
--
Weather in Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Netherlands 10/06 19:25:
19.0°C Few clouds mostly cloudy wind 3.1 m/s SW (-2 m above NAP)
--
Ervaringen met het Syndroom van Asperger:
http://topjaklont.student.utwente.nl
Socialistische Partij:
http://www.sp.nl/