P.'s talks are NO JOKE either.
I had understood from what other people said that
Philippe was probably NOT talking. So...do you mean he
is ?
don't do to
others what you would not want
others to do with you. At least that is what the
Bible
taught us. I believe that's a valid
suggestion.
::demonstration of how this could lead to a
flamefest,
::and that we shoud stay neutral Anthere
I am an atheist thanks God, this does not apply to
me then :)
::end of demonstration don't catch the flame pliz!
Fair enough
I stay by this assertion though
You're right, I have thought about the law point
of
view thanks to all
of you, it is one point to take into account but not
pertinent in WP
spirit : I therefore propose that we respect
epistemological principles
such as considering Ockham (who was Franciscan
Anthere) razor for
instance as a good criterion for accepting (or
rejecting) a theory. We
may have to define our epistemological principles
then, shouldn't we ?
go ahead and put these principles down
we'll see
but science is not the beginning nor the end of
everything.
And a
Wikip_dia where grown-up throw such words to
each others faces is definitly not a place I would
recommand to anybody, if only my kids. So please
Aoineko, for the sake of peace, give up the
insults.
On one hand, insults are unforgiveable, on the other
hand Aoineko is
right : there are fights some days and P's behaviour
is unforgivable
too, Anthere. I do rather face conflicts, than
ignore them.
Sure.
I noticed you put this into action by being yourself
responsible for a *vandalisme* this morning. It was
very fortunate Aoineko noticed it and corrected your
very arbitrary deletion (you were strongly lucky he
labelled that "erreure")
Check out
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=P%E9dophilie&diff=26449&…
with comment : diffamatoire, non objectif
Clearly, all your recent edits show that you are
yourself very biased, with a strong scientist side,
and a difficult relation with everything that is
related to unusual sexuality. It is important to know,
for us to be very careful of what you do.
Btw, I finally understood why we disagreed on the
racism page
Your comment :
" Le doute sur les sciences, un coup on les invoque,
l'autre on les r�voque. Tu reconnais donc que le
racisme n'est pas une th�orie scientifique, ou quoi?"
This comment shows clearly the need to separate racism
and racialism. For when you are talking of racism, you
are really dealing of racialism. Racism is not a
scientific theory, and all you are talking about
belongs to racialism. When this is clear to you, we
should move the discussion to the racialism
discussion.
Friendly yours,
yup.
btw 2 : as for the article on cunninlingus, allow me
to be more of a reference than you maybe. I will be
glad if you provide references.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com