Le Sun, 2 Feb 2003 02:24:18 -0800 (PST),
inspiré Anthere <anthere5(a)yahoo.com> écrivait la plume alerte :
Right Aoineko.
Calling someone "Philippe Kampf" is NO JOKE.
Especially after all the words you have used to depict
him.
Or it means we have a very different definition of
what a joke is. Then we should try an article on
jokes, that might be interesting to give examples
It was no joke, he made a mistake
by getting in the flame war, so did I.
I just recognize I still make mistakes too.
P.'s talks are NO JOKE either.
> > There is nothing to justify the insults you use
>
> There is nothing to justify incitement to racism
Yes, arguments ad hominem do
not serve your opinion. Sorry, Aoineko I
cannot support you on this even though I fully agree with you. It
decreases your credibility : you were clearly fooled by a provocator.
Next time be more careful, you erased P.'s own unforgivable behaviour.
"Defending a cause with bad arguments is the best way to screw it up"
Nietzche (approx)
There is nothing to justify insulting people and
calling them bad names. It only leads to exasparation,
suffering and escalation of violence. We are lucky
Philippe is not replying to your insults with further
insults. What would you do then ? Would you consider
using even nastier insults, or calling the cops ?
That's a luck in our bad luck
he did not reply. And, yes I could
consider calling cops if there are serious grounds, even if I get blamed
for this. No one is supposed to ignore the law.
But apart from legal matters, for which I don't care
much, don't do to others what you would not want
others to do with you. At least that is what the Bible
taught us. I believe that's a valid suggestion.
::demonstration of how this
could lead to a flamefest,
::and that we shoud stay neutral Anthere
I am an atheist thanks God, this does not apply to me then :)
::end of demonstration don't catch the flame pliz!
You're right, I have thought about the law point of view thanks to all
of you, it is one point to take into account but not pertinent in WP
spirit : I therefore propose that we respect epistemological principles
such as considering Ockham (who was Franciscan Anthere) razor for
instance as a good criterion for accepting (or rejecting) a theory. We
may have to define our epistemological principles then, shouldn't we ?
And a Wikip_dia where grown-up throw such words to
each others faces is definitly not a place I would
recommand to anybody, if only my kids. So please
Aoineko, for the sake of peace, give up the insults.
On one hand, insults are
unforgiveable, on the other hand Aoineko is
right : there are fights some days and P's behaviour is unforgivable
too, Anthere. I do rather face conflicts, than ignore them.
Friendly yours,
--
Julien Tayon
http://www.tayon.net/ http://libroscope.org/
Si la vérité est une femme, essayons de la séduire avant de la saisir.