Mark Williamson wrote:
Yes, but it has not been released yet, and according to
Brion we won't
use it until it is.
So, unless they want to wait until some time in 2006 for their own
Wikipedia, we'll have to make do with a non-3-letter code.
Sorry, I'll take it short this time: not using "vor" does not make
sense
- it would just mean a 100%: please do double work as next year
everything would then need to be adapted.
If vor is likely to be the code it should be used to avoid
misunderstandings in 2006 as people will ask how come we were not able
to use the official code even it is was known before official release
date. There's no law that prevents us from using it.
My 2 cts. (EURO;-)
Ciao, Sabine