Mark Williamson wrote:
Yes, but it has not been released yet, and according to Brion we won't use it until it is.
So, unless they want to wait until some time in 2006 for their own Wikipedia, we'll have to make do with a non-3-letter code.
Sorry, I'll take it short this time: not using "vor" does not make sense - it would just mean a 100%: please do double work as next year everything would then need to be adapted.
If vor is likely to be the code it should be used to avoid misunderstandings in 2006 as people will ask how come we were not able to use the official code even it is was known before official release date. There's no law that prevents us from using it.
My 2 cts. (EURO;-)
Ciao, Sabine