We are delighted by see fr.wikipedia used as source.
Nevertheless, certain questions arise.
Some editors estimate that according to GFDL'S, there
should obligatorily be a link to the original article,
to preserve the access of the history, to check the
authorship of the article. Is this true?
In addition, there is no link towards WikipÈdia on
this website, or to any article of Wikipedia. Only,
one partially broken and extrËmement discrete link for
each article. Is this ok?
RÈcupÈrÈe de "http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Droit&search="
DerniËre modification de cette page : 10 sep 2003 ý 20:03. Tous les textes
sont disponibles sous les termes de la Licence de documentation libre GNU .
Here's a copy of the link and notice at the bottom of the article on law.
In this case the link works. My experience on Internet-Encyclopedia is that
is is very easy to make a mistake in the link. You have to always check and
correct it or you will have a bunch of broken links. They need notice to be
more careful. The language Licence de documentation libre GNU is a link to
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Copyright which would seem to
serve.
Fred.
It is also normal that figure always in footer the
mention of copyright of ebabylone?
What do you think ?
Normal unconscious behavior as it can legitimately refer to only the
material on the page other than the Wikipedia article.
Fred