We are delighted by see fr.wikipedia used as source. Nevertheless, certain questions arise.
Some editors estimate that according to GFDL'S, there should obligatorily be a link to the original article, to preserve the access of the history, to check the authorship of the article. Is this true?
In addition, there is no link towards WikipÈdia on this website, or to any article of Wikipedia. Only, one partially broken and extrËmement discrete link for each article. Is this ok?
RÈcupÈrÈe de "http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Droit&search=" DerniËre modification de cette page : 10 sep 2003 ý 20:03. Tous les textes sont disponibles sous les termes de la Licence de documentation libre GNU .
Here's a copy of the link and notice at the bottom of the article on law. In this case the link works. My experience on Internet-Encyclopedia is that is is very easy to make a mistake in the link. You have to always check and correct it or you will have a bunch of broken links. They need notice to be more careful. The language Licence de documentation libre GNU is a link to http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%E9dia:Copyright which would seem to serve.
Fred.
It is also normal that figure always in footer the mention of copyright of ebabylone?
What do you think ?
Normal unconscious behavior as it can legitimately refer to only the material on the page other than the Wikipedia article.
Fred