Daniel Mayer wrote:
This especially seems true for the English Wikipedia
where there is/are (and
I roughly quote); article censorship and fear of censorship, where
administrators harass contributors and delete pages (stated in a way that
suggests this is a form of excessive censorship), and where those same
administrators block pages from being edited (again suggesting that this is
some kind of unfair censorship).
Is there any indication of how they handle editing content to avoid
this impression with new contributors?
> They also seem to not like the fact that a
"American for-profit .com company
> that wants to establish a presence in the educational market* controls
> Wikipedia (the .com part may be a directed toward wikipedia's URL and not
> Bomis - my Spanish is rusty and the fish ain't much help).
Perhaps the impending trickle influx of
Marxist.org content will
improve their opinion of our project?
> All I can say is that they sure have a
twisted sense of how things really
> are.
This seems to occur occasionally/frequently with newcomers. I wonder if
we can improve the initial impression received somehow without
compromising
our long term goal.
regards,
mirwin