2007/9/20, Ian Tresman <ian2(a)knowledge.co.uk>uk>:
The problem is that a tiny number of editors
think that THEY are the
sole arbiters of notability. The fact is that many concept are
notable to minority groups, and only the view of their group counts.
Abolish notability and you have no problem.
Well, unless like me you consider the inclusion of tons of trivial and
worthless information along with the good stuff a problem.
But "trivial"
and "worthless" are just as subjective as "notability".
The problem is not in our desire to exclude such things, but in our
defining them. Assuming good faith should be a part of the definition.
Ec