http://www.snellspace.com/IBM_Blogging_Policy_and_Guidelines.pdfhttp://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/59570
experpts:
"Whether or not an IBMer chooses to create or participate in a blog or a
wiki or other form of online publishing or discussion is his or her own
decision."
"2. Blogs, wikis and other forms of online discourse are individual
interactions, not corporate communications. IBMers are personally
responsible for their posts."
I wish to register my support for the creation of a
Scots language wiki.
Bryan Parry
bajparry(a)yahoo.co.uk
I have spread my dreams under your feet;
Tread softly, because you tread on my dreams.
-- William Butler Yeats
___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
There have been a variety of discussions on meta about Official
Positions [OP]; some of them recent. See
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Official_positionhttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_agenda/Open_questions_2#Positions
This is one of the major elements of discussion at today's Board meeting.
I would like to present a somewhat contra-OP argument that the core of
WP's success has not been its exclusive delegation of responsibility
to individuals, but rather its successful empowerment of /all/ of its
users, even new ones, to jump in and do what needs to be done.
Providing Officers with unique power and authority is a two-edged
sword; it encourages those individuals to take extra responsibility,
and provides them with authority to herd other volunteers. But simply
going out and working diligently on a project provides a similar
authority, and an internal, rather than an external, sense of
responsibility.
The existence of rare, Board-sanctioned official positions in areas
where there is not already an active group of un-official Wikipedians,
can discourage the rest of the community from jumping in, and adds
heirarchy and single points of failure to what would otherwise (in the
case of a pressing event) be an open system.
I would be comfortable with the creation of special interest groups
based around the priorities of the community and the foundation,
before deciding on individuals to represent those interests. Creating
titled individuals to carve out new interest groups, as has been
suggested in the past, is certainly unwiki and probably unscalable.
--
+sj+
In the past I've had disagreements with Raul about the copyright
status of some of the music he has been uploading. In these cases he
has received permission from the recording artist, but the recording
artist may not have had the right to grant permission due to the music
itself being new and copyrighted, or due to the performer working off
copyrighted score.
Clearing rights for music is a complex and difficult area to deal
with, and I gave up arguing it with Raul at the time as it's clear
that his intentions were good and that we could deal with it when
someone finally complained.
However, Raul recently uploaded
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Morissette_-_Ironic.ogg
I brought this issue up to him, and his reply was that yes, it looks
somewhat fishy but the boilerplate copyright waver on a government
website should be sufficient.
I am pretty much without words on this. I think Raul's behavior on the
matter of music copyright is negligent. I know this is a harsh thing
to say, ... I gave him the benefit of the doubt on the classical
music, but there is no other way I can describe the uploading of the
Ironic song.
Overall, wikipedia's handling of material taken from government
websites has been playing it fast and loose (it's only PD if the
government created it, if they bought it from someone they might have
the right to distribute it, but *we* may not) but we've really stepped
over the line with this one.
We need to have a discussion of how to handle music copyright issues.
Hello,
There are special digraphs in the Ossetic alphabet considered
"letters". They are: Дз, Дж, Къ, Хъ, Пъ, Тъ, Цъ, Чъ.
How can I make them appear in the categories?
See:
http://os.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:%D0%A6%C3%A6%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%98…
In this category we have two examples of misrepresenting:
Хъæдгæрон under the letter "Х" (it should be under a digraph "Хъ") and
Дзæуджыхъæу under the letter "Д" with Донифарс, though they start in
different sounds/letters (Дз & Д).
How can I manage this situation? Maybe there is some fast'n'easy way
to make those headlines "Дз", "Дж", etc.?
I know the problem will appear for many other languages too: e. g. in
all the languages writing Cyrillic in the Caucasus they have digraphs
(Къ, КI, etc.) and even trigraphs (Къу, etc.).
Sl. Ivanov,
os.wikipedia admin
--
Esperu cxiam!
--- Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > But at least we've picked out the name :)
>
> Is it a supertitious issue not to make it public ?
I haven't registered the domain name yet! :)
> I hope everything will be fine, but at least, now it can happen any
> time
> with no problem :-)
Everything will be fine. I'll announce at some point. Thanks.
Chris Mahan
818.943.1850 cell
chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com
chris.mahan(a)gmail.com
http://www.christophermahan.com/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--- Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mark Williamson a �crit:
> > Sounds like a good idea! I'm donating my firstborn.
> >
> > Mark
>
> That sounds like a very unreasonable idea Mark :-)
>
> By the way, we have not much mail from him these days... is
> Christopher
> baby born yet ?
4 more weeks, and the baby showers are killing me. My wife had 4!
(i'm busy writing thank you cards...
But at least we've picked out the name :)
Chris Mahan
818.943.1850 cell
chris_mahan(a)yahoo.com
chris.mahan(a)gmail.com
http://www.christophermahan.com/
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
Read on OTRS...
De :
xxx(anonymised) <xxx(anonymised)(a)yahoo.co.uk>
À:board@wikimedia.org
Sujet:E
Are you interested from a skeleton 5000 years old
(maybe,not sure,very possible to be older), 5 meters
high?
Yf "yes" contact me as soon is possible!
The month of May is in Sweden a time when all snow has finally
melted and we start to see flowers and green leaves on trees.
This is why its a good month for outdoor photography.
What if I could use a GPS navigator to connect geo coordinates (as
well as timestamps) to all my photos, and then arrange a photo
album with a geographic (and temporal) search. If the album was
an international collaborative effort, we could photograph every
street corner and get a global view. All it would take, really,
is to input geo coordinates to the photos at Wikimedia Commons,
perhaps with a metadata template similar to the one that the
German Wikipedia uses for {{Personendaten}}. The geo search can be
added later, just like Google search indexes the text. So far I
have uploaded a few dozen pictures to Wikimedia Commons, but a
project like this could make that a few thousand. Different
technical solutions than today might become necessary.
It turns out I'm not the first to think like this. Let's see
what's out there:
GEOsnapper (www.geosnapper.com) is a website created two years ago
by uLocate, Inc., a company headquartered in Farningham,
Massachusetts. I don't know how or if they make money from this,
but they seem to have a contract with Nextel, a U.S. cell phone
company, and have a special service for owners of the Motorola
i860 GPS-enabled camera cell phone. The site uses maps from
MapQuest. It's a commercial company and users are "allowed" to
upload their images for free (gee, thanks), but there is no
Creative Commons licensing and no "right to fork". Users cannot
easily communicate with each other, and cannot correct each
other's mistakes (it's not a wiki). Some people are uploading
pictures of individual animals, that could have been taken
anywhere, and I don't know if anybody is weeding out that kind of
"vandalism". I cannot know how many pictures are in there, but
the dozen or so that I uploaded from California, Manhattan,
Germany and Sweden seem to have added significantly to the
coverage of these areas. I think that many good ideas can be
borrowed from this site, but in its current form it has not been
able to attract a sufficient amount of contributors. It might be
"the Nupedia of geosnapping". Why don't you try it out. You can
find all of my photos at
http://www.geosnapper.com/list.php?op=1;user=aronsson
The Degree Confluence Project (www.confluence.org) collects photos
from every integral crossing of latitudes and longitudes around
the globe. This is a hobby similar to Geocaching, attracting a
few fanatics who visit obscure places just because they own a GPS.
It is a fascinating concept, but really not very useful.
A9.com is the web search engine of Amazon.com. Its Yellow Pages
(yp.a9.com) features photos of every store front in ten U.S.
cities, including New York City and San Francisco. They call this
system Block View and a technical description can be found at
http://yp.a9.com/-/company/YellowPages.jsp
There is still an open gap between Google Maps' satellite images
and the store front photos of yp.a9.com. How could that gap be
closed? Flying around with a helicopter to photograph every
street and city block from above? :-)
GeoURL (www.geourl.org) connects web pages (mostly blogs) to geo
coordinates and offers a proximity search. No maps or photos are
involved. GeoURL was gone for some time during 2004, but is now
back in version 2.0.
There are some collaborative mapping projects in Britain
(Geowiki.co.uk, Knowhere.co.uk, OpenGuides.org, UpMyStreet.com)
where cities are geographically documented, similar to
Wikitravel.org, but I think that a successful project needs to be
global.
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se