Scríobh Mark Williamson:
> Well, I for one felt it was nessecary to replace all content with
> copyvio notices
Wow, slam-dunk for overstepping the mark there. Since the whole "One
Chinese Wikipedia" thing, you've done nothing except stir the pot and try to
cause trouble. How old are you Mark, twelve? I realise this is not the
place for a flamefest, but I think that describing you as a "decent editor"
is being pretty generous. All you've contributed to this list is a bunch of
half-researched junk about Sicilian and Gothic, which is either flat wrong
or which no supporting material can be found for, and you've done it all
with a very hostile attitude to a lot of people who have been very patient
with you.
I'm willing to accept that it's the impetuousness of youth causing this
trouble, but attempting to wipe out a whole Wikipedia without consulting
anyone first was really just going a bit too far. I suggest you think
carefully in the future about what you say, what you do, and how it will be
perceived, and in the meantime, that you lay very, very, very low.
Regards,
- Craig Franklin
-------------------
Craig Franklin
PO Box 764
Ashgrove, Q, 4060
Australia
http://www.halo-17.net - Australia's Favourite Source of Indie Music, Art,
and Culture.
----- Original Message -----
From: <wikipedia-l-request(a)Wikimedia.org>
To: <wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:38 PM
Subject: [personal] Wikipedia-l Digest, Vol 14, Issue 47
> Send Wikipedia-l mailing list submissions to
> wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wikipedia-l-request(a)Wikimedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> wikipedia-l-owner(a)Wikimedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wikipedia-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. RE: Request for a new Wikipedia (James R. Johnson)
> 2. Re: Request for a new Wikipedia (Mark Williamson)
> 3. Re: Starting a new wiki (Ray Saintonge)
> 4. RE: Request for a new Wikipedia (Alfio Puglisi)
> 5. Re: Request for a new Wikipedia (Mark Williamson)
> 6. Re: Request for a new Wikipedia (Anthere)
> 7. Re: Re: Request for a new Wikipedia (Mark Williamson)
> 8. RE: Re: Request for a new Wikipedia (James R. Johnson)
> 9. toki pona (Angela_)
> 10. Re: toki pona (Tim Starling)
> 11. Re: toki pona (Mark Williamson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:58:04 -0400
> From: "James R. Johnson" <modean52(a)comcast.net>
> Subject: RE: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: <wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
> Message-ID: <20040921195810.3543C1AC0252(a)mail.wikimedia.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I tried Chinese, but didn't get too far. I stuck with Anglo-Saxon,
German,
> French, Latin, and English. I'm best in German and Anglo-Saxon (speaking,
> writing), then French, then Latin. English is my first language. How
'bout
> you, node?
>
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ray Saintonge
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:22 PM
> To: Mark Williamson; wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
>
> Mark Williamson wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> >Sicilian language.
> >
> >Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
> connectivity.
> >
> >I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> >
> Your fluency in traditional Chinese, Gothic, and now Sicilian is a
> remarkable feat that few of us can duplicate. In the absence of such
> abilities I would tend to suggest that we wait for a request to be made
> by those who would like to work in Sicilian.
>
> Ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:19:25 -0700
> From: Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <849f98ed04092113194d086ac(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Question, when did I claim fluency in Gothic?
>
> --node
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:21:30 -0700, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Mark Williamson wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> > >Sicilian language.
> > >
> > >Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
connectivity.
> > >
> > >I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> > >
> > Your fluency in traditional Chinese, Gothic, and now Sicilian is a
> > remarkable feat that few of us can duplicate. In the absence of such
> > abilities I would tend to suggest that we wait for a request to be made
> > by those who would like to work in Sicilian.
> >
> > Ec
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:25:14 -0700
> From: Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Starting a new wiki
> To: wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <41508E2A.1090604(a)telus.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
> Yann Forget wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Le Tuesday 21 September 2004 19:08, Ray Saintonge a écrit :
> >
> >
> >>translated. Tagore died in 1941, so his works are essentially all in
> >>the public domain based on the life plus 60 law that prevails for India.
> >>
> >>
> >I am not sure. Does this apply worldwide?
> >If yes, I have some texts available for Wikisource.
> >
> >
> For the relevant Indian law see
> http://www.naukri.com/lls/copyright/section5.htm#22
>
> For the relationship to US law see [[Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v.
> Russian Kurier, Inc.]] in Wikipedia.
>
> Ec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:44:07 +0200 (MEST)
> From: Alfio Puglisi <puglisi(a)arcetri.astro.it>
> Subject: RE: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409212340240.24544@zeus>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> AFAIK, sicilian today has been blended a lot with Italian. The average
> sicilian hears Italian on television and writes in italian, not sicilian.
> I'm sure most of them have no idea of how Sicilian is written (I have no
> idea myself, but that doesn't count). It's not taught in schools, it's
> mostly oral tradition.
>
> Alfio
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, James R. Johnson wrote:
>
> >Cool. How is Sicilian related to Italian and French?
> >
> >James
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
> >[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mark Williamson
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:21 PM
> >To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> >Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> >Sicilian language.
> >
> >Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
> >connectivity.
> >
> >I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> >
> >best,
> >node
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wikipedia-l mailing list
> >Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Wikipedia-l mailing list
> >Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:14:07 -0700
> From: Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <849f98ed040921151470b01c3c(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> There are plenty of Sicilian-language websites online, in fact there
> are more than there are for Sardinian which is much much much more
> different from standard Italian.
>
> As far as how its written, see http://www.linguasiciliana.org/lsu.htm
> (lingua siciliana unificata).
>
> There are more books available in Sicilian than there are in Sardinian
> as well, including a few translations of popular literature. Also,
> Sicilian is, along with Italian, a co-official language of the
> Sicilian autonomous region of Italy.
>
> --node
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:44:07 +0200 (MEST), Alfio Puglisi
> <puglisi(a)arcetri.astro.it> wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK, sicilian today has been blended a lot with Italian. The average
> > sicilian hears Italian on television and writes in italian, not
sicilian.
> > I'm sure most of them have no idea of how Sicilian is written (I have no
> > idea myself, but that doesn't count). It's not taught in schools, it's
> > mostly oral tradition.
> >
> > Alfio
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, James R. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > >Cool. How is Sicilian related to Italian and French?
> > >
> > >James
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
> > >[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mark Williamson
> > >Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:21 PM
> > >To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> > >Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Request for a new Wikipedia
> > >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> > >Sicilian language.
> > >
> > >Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
> > >connectivity.
> > >
> > >I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> > >
> > >best,
> > >node
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > >Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > >Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > >http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:30:16 +0200
> From: Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikipedia.org
> Message-ID: <4150AB78.5060303(a)yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Do you have perhaps 5 editors able to write and read sicilian AND
> interested in starting that wikipedia ?
>
> ant
>
>
> Mark Williamson a écrit:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> > Sicilian language.
> >
> > Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
connectivity.
> >
> > I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> >
> > best,
> > node
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:22:31 -0700
> From: Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <849f98ed0409211622527475a8(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I could probably get some together, but why is that nessecary? Most of
> the Wikipedias we have started with one or two users. The Cornish Wiki
> is growing at a very surprising pace, and it only has two editors.
>
> --node
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:30:16 +0200, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do you have perhaps 5 editors able to write and read sicilian AND
> > interested in starting that wikipedia ?
> >
> > ant
> >
> > Mark Williamson a écrit:
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> > > Sicilian language.
> > >
> > > Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
connectivity.
> > >
> > > I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> > >
> > > best,
> > > node
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:09:54 -0400
> From: "James R. Johnson" <modean52(a)comcast.net>
> Subject: RE: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Request for a new Wikipedia
> To: "'Mark Williamson'" <node.ue(a)gmail.com>,
> <wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org>
> Message-ID: <20040922021039.247641AC028C(a)mail.wikimedia.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ditto Anglo-Saxon. There are at least 5-10 core people I can get to write
> articles, with perhaps 50 or so others for minor contributions, not
counting
> traffic to the various OE websites that could be redirected to the
> Anglo-Saxon wiki, plus the people who e-mail me personally asking about
OE.
> Est-ce que vous parlez en Francais, Mark? Je vais aller à France ce mars.
>
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mark Williamson
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:23 PM
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Request for a new Wikipedia
>
> I could probably get some together, but why is that nessecary? Most of
> the Wikipedias we have started with one or two users. The Cornish Wiki
> is growing at a very surprising pace, and it only has two editors.
>
> --node
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:30:16 +0200, Anthere <anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do you have perhaps 5 editors able to write and read sicilian AND
> > interested in starting that wikipedia ?
> >
> > ant
> >
> > Mark Williamson a écrit:
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
> > > Sicilian language.
> > >
> > > Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet
> connectivity.
> > >
> > > I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
> > >
> > > best,
> > > node
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:45:36 +0100
> From: Angela_ <beesley(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: [Wikipedia-l] toki pona
> To: Wikipedia Mailing List <wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org>, sonja(a)kisa.ca
> Message-ID: <8b722b8004092119452220127f(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I've just reverted over 200 edits on the toki pona Wikipedia. Someone
> apparently feels the language is copyrighted so decided to replace
> every page, including user pages and the main page, with a copyright
> violation notice, presumably with the use of a bot. I've reverted
> these, although unfortunately the "bot rollback" failed on later pages
> so recent changes is a mess. I haven't deleted anything, so if people
> want to see the pages, such as "copyviopedia" this person created they
> can still do so.
>
> As far as I am aware Sonja Kisa, the creator of the language, has
> released it under the GFDL, but I can't find any mailing list evidence
> to back this up.
>
> If this is not the case, the wiki should obviously be removed but
> vandalizing hundreds of pages is not the way to go about this. I
> suggest we wait to hear from Sonja on the status of the copyright and
> remove it she can not confirm it is GFDL.
>
> Angela.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:05:18 +1000
> From: Tim Starling <ts4294967296(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Wikipedia-l] Re: toki pona
> To: wikipedia-l(a)wikipedia.org
> Message-ID: <ciqq5g$gca$1(a)sea.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Angela_ wrote:
> > I've just reverted over 200 edits on the toki pona Wikipedia. Someone
> > apparently feels the language is copyrighted so decided to replace
> > every page, including user pages and the main page, with a copyright
> > violation notice, presumably with the use of a bot. I've reverted
> > these, although unfortunately the "bot rollback" failed on later pages
> > so recent changes is a mess. I haven't deleted anything, so if people
> > want to see the pages, such as "copyviopedia" this person created they
> > can still do so.
>
> Edits were performed anonymously with the IP address 24.251.242.236 .
> The corresponding hostname is ip24-251-242-236.ph.ph.cox.net.
>
> On the English Wikipedia:
>
> mysql> select distinct rc_user_text from recentchanges where
> rc_ip='24.251.242.236';
> +--------------+
> | rc_user_text |
> +--------------+
> | Node ue |
> +--------------+
>
> I suggest a temporary ban from all projects effective immediately.
>
> -- Tim Starling
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:38:29 -0700
> From: Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] toki pona
> To: Angela_ <beesley(a)gmail.com>, wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
> Message-ID: <849f98ed040921203830a61096(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Well, I for one felt it was nessecary to replace all content with
> copyvio notices because it states explicitly on the Toki Pona homepage
> that Toki Pona is copyrighted. In a cursory Google search, just to
> make sure I wasn't missing some sort of release by Sonja of the
> information into the public domain or under some sort of terms, I
> found no page under which Sonja released the language in any sort of
> way.
>
> While it is debatable whether or not a language is copyrightable (see
> Lojban), I feared for Wikipedias interests and so took down those
> pages immediately pending further investigation.
>
> Some have raised the point that a significant number of the pages were
> written by Sonja herself, and thus were explicitly released under the
> terms of the gfdl when she clicked "submit".
>
> I have two things to say to that:
>
> 1. At the time I did not realise this.
>
> 2. Since I suspected that they were copyvios, rather than checking the
> history of each of 200-odd pages I simply replaced them all.
>
> Since it appears they were indeed *not* copyvio, the appropriate
> course of action is simply to revert them to their previous versions
> after it has been shown that they aren't copyvio, and then keep going
> from where you were.
>
> Whether or not I am blocked from all projects is obviously not my
> choice, but I will submit that I have contributed much to the
> community. For example, just in the past couple of days I have made
> logos for over a dozen Wikipedias, and posted them on Meta. I am also
> (at least I think) partially responsible for the founding of fo: and
> lb: (I informed people of the possibility of creating them).
>
> Anyhow the decision doesn't rest in my hands. I will not object if it
> is decided that I should be blocked or banned or whatever, I will only
> defend myself against specific arguments.
>
> --node
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 03:45:36 +0100, Angela_ <beesley(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've just reverted over 200 edits on the toki pona Wikipedia. Someone
> > apparently feels the language is copyrighted so decided to replace
> > every page, including user pages and the main page, with a copyright
> > violation notice, presumably with the use of a bot. I've reverted
> > these, although unfortunately the "bot rollback" failed on later pages
> > so recent changes is a mess. I haven't deleted anything, so if people
> > want to see the pages, such as "copyviopedia" this person created they
> > can still do so.
> >
> > As far as I am aware Sonja Kisa, the creator of the language, has
> > released it under the GFDL, but I can't find any mailing list evidence
> > to back this up.
> >
> > If this is not the case, the wiki should obviously be removed but
> > vandalizing hundreds of pages is not the way to go about this. I
> > suggest we wait to hear from Sonja on the status of the copyright and
> > remove it she can not confirm it is GFDL.
> >
> > Angela.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikipedia-l mailing list
> > Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
>
> End of Wikipedia-l Digest, Vol 14, Issue 47
> *******************************************
>
>
Hi all,
The ISO 639 committee has *just* (literally) approved a code for the
Sicilian language.
Sicilian has over 6 million speakers, and there is good internet connectivity.
I would like to request that scn: be created for Sicilian.
best,
node
> I think that if there are people who speak the language, even if in a
> merely academic context, a Wikipedia is worthwhile. What about the
> Latin Wikipedia?
It depends on what you call 'speak the language'. I want to be sure that
there are people who _use_ the language, that is, communicate in it. For
example, if there is a journal that comes out once a year, where articles
are written in Gothic.
But in this case I have the feeling that 'speak the language' means that
they _know_ the language, and the only use of the language is to read
centuries old texts that were written in Gothic or as an object of study
itself. And then I don't think a Wikipedia is worthwhile.
Regarding Latin: It's still being used on a daily basis in the Roman
Catholic church, for one thing.
Andre Engels
May I just remind everyone that the status of Toki Pona as a copyrighted
language, assuming that languages are in fact copyrightable, does not
preclude its also being licensed under the GFDL. As Sonja Kisa is the
creator of the language and, as I understand it, the primary contributor
on the Toki Pona Wikipedia, I would suggest that she has effectively
licensed Wikipedia to use the language, even if she has a copyright.
It's exactly the same as any of us who retain copyright in anything we
submit on Wikipedia.
--Michael Snow
Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Another option would be to pay for private hosting and set up the
> MediaWiki software yourself, which I can tell you is not going to be
> very pleasant if you're not experienced in setting up server-side
> apps.
MediaWiki is definitely _not_ the only game in town as far as wiki engines are
concerned. PmWiki and PhpWiki are both very easy to install and run on PHP
servers without needing a database.
Really, setting up a wiki isn't much harder than setting up a static Web site.
And it's sure a lot more dignified than groveling at the feet of some admin
begging for a few minutes of his time. B-)
~ESP
Mark Williamson said:
>> Anyways: I think the best strategy is to tell people who want to have a
>> Wikipedia in their language to go start a wiki somewhere else. If they can
>> show that they have a robust community that can support a Wikipedia, then
>> they should get an xx.wikipedia.org domain (as well as other
>> xx.wikisomething.org stuff).
>
> I find that horribly discriminatory.
I find it appropriately discriminatory. As a project, the Wikimedia Foundation
has to apply some judgement about where to devote its physical resources and the
time and effort of its volunteers. If we waste the time and energy of those
volunteers for unimportant tasks, they won't come back.
You very well may disagree about what choices the Foundation makes. I'm just
saying that it's a really big Internet, and that if you want to create a wiki
that no one else wants, you can do that. You don't have to have the Wikimedia
Foundation's machines and volunteers to do it.
~ESP
Scríobh Mark Williamson:
>Also I feel that as long as it isn't a conlang, it doesn't matter how
>many speakers there are as long as there are people interested in
>writing an encyclopedia.
You do realise that Esperanto is a conlang, and it has one of the most
active Wikis out there? There are some other conlang-Wikis out there too,
like tlhIngan Hol, Interlingua, and Sindarin (Tolkeinese, I seem to remember
this existing, although I can't remember the code).
I think that so long as a language has modern speakers, some of whom are
interested in writing an encyclopædia, there should be no restrictions.
That said, while a Gothic wikipedia would be interesting (I'm sure this is
the Robert Smith fan inside me speaking ;-) ), I'd wonder whether there
really is that much interest in it. Even being optimistic and taking a high
estimate for the number of speakers (say, 5,000), I don't know if anyone
would actually be willing to add to it. Not that having a Gothic Wiki with
no entries would really tax the foundation, but I don't think we need
*another* deserted Wiki with five articles in it.
As always though, it's not up to me to decide ;-)
- Craig Franklin
-------------------
Craig Franklin
PO Box 764
Ashgrove, Q, 4060
Australia
http://www.halo-17.net - Australia's Favourite Source of Indie Music, Art,
and Culture.
Sometimes I like to have several 'pedias open at once, in tabs,
and it would be nice if they had different favicons. These icons
are in the tabs, so if they did, I could tell which pedia was
in a tab quickly.
I have made some simple ones for Meta, Wikibooks and Wikiquote,
and was wondering if someone could put them on the wikis. They
are at http://yath.phreadom.net/wikicons/.
Thanks!
--
Joshua Swink
yathster(a)yahoo.com