Hoi,
What is different why this should be deemoed eligible? Activity is not an
argument.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op ma 2 apr. 2018 om 17:54 schreef Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com>
I saw no objections (or any other types of comments)
to the idea of
rejecting Wikipedia Northwest African Arabic
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Northwest_African_Arabic>
and Wikipedia Colloquial Cantonese
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Colloquial_Cantonese>,
so I am going forward with those.
I would still like some thoughts on the subject of Wikipedia Marwari
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Marwari>.
It's a macrolanguage, but on the other hand as far as I can tell this is a
decently active test project—and none of its consituent languages has a
test project. So I'm inclined to mark this eligible.
Steven
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom