We can lock and leave the "content"
there and inform people that if they
wish to contribute further they can start a test project on the Incubator
if that's okay.
2018-03-21 15:33 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hoi,
Having a project locked is different from having it moved to
Incubator.. I do not object to the project being locked.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 21 March 2018 at 14:39, MarcoAurelio <strigiwm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Issue is that we're serving a project for just 15 pages. I'd argue
> that is, indeed, absence of content since the wiki creation. Combined with
> no users interested in the project, etc., the best we can do, IMHO, is to
> lock the project and return it back to Incubator. Respectfully submitted,
> MA.
>
> 2018-03-20 7:38 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
>> Hoi,
>> As there is nothing new, no change in the maintenance needed for this
>> particular project I see his point but I do not see the need.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 19 March 2018 at 23:54, Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please see Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Malagasy
>>> Wikibooks
>>>
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Malagasy_Wikibooks>
on
>>> Meta.
>>>
>>>
>>> The general argument here is that this project has been dormant for
>>> about ten years, and should be closed. There is not a vandalism problem on
>>> the project, and indeed I argued that LangCom's current position is that
it
>>> is better to leave dormant projects alone than to close them and move them
>>> to Incubator.
>>>
>>>
>>> User:MarcoAurelio, a steward who has posted here occasionally,
>>> argues that it's one more dormant project for stewards and global sysops
to
>>> watch, and that in his view, it would be better to close this project. Two
>>> people in the community have responded: one user who really the only
>>> material contributor in the last ten years, along with an active sysop from
>>> Malagasy Wikipedia. Both effectively take the position that they're
>>> OK either way.
>>>
>>>
>>> I would personally argue against closing, because I don't see this
>>> as being a special case, and I'm concerned that it would open the doors
to
>>> many more requests to close small projects. But I'd like to hear some
>>> other opinions about this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org