I would like to get this decided definitively. Based on the discussion thread on the subject that started January 31 and went into February, it seems to me that LangCom was leaning favorably toward this project. However, that discussion thread was not closed definitively, so I'd ask for that to happen now. Thank you.
Steven
Sent from Outlookhttp://aka.ms/weboutlook
Thanks, Steve, for the reminder.
Last time, the discussion got sidetracked into discussing [grc] instead of [lfn]. Hopefully, we'll stay on track this time.
I vote +1 for approving Lingua Franca Nova Wikipedia. (Still for the same arguments which swayed me in February, particularly Jan's and Michael's posts.)
Oliver
On 01-Dec-17 15:57, Steven White wrote:
I would like to get this decided definitively. Based on the discussion thread on the subject that started January 31 and went into February, it seems to me that LangCom was leaning favorably toward this project. However, that discussion thread was not closed definitively, so I'd ask for that to happen now. Thank you.
Steven
Sent from Outlook http://aka.ms/weboutlook
http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient Virus-free. www.avg.com http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
I reiterate my approval.
On 1 Dec 2017, at 15:58, Oliver Stegen oliver_stegen@sil.org wrote:
Thanks, Steve, for the reminder.
Last time, the discussion got sidetracked into discussing [grc] instead of [lfn]. Hopefully, we'll stay on track this time.
I vote +1 for approving Lingua Franca Nova Wikipedia. (Still for the same arguments which swayed me in February, particularly Jan's and Michael's posts.)
Oliver
On 01-Dec-17 15:57, Steven White wrote:
I would like to get this decided definitively. Based on the discussion thread on the subject that started January 31 and went into February, it seems to me that LangCom was leaning favorably toward this project. However, that discussion thread was not closed definitively, so I'd ask for that to happen now. Thank you.
Steven
Sent from Outlook
Virus-free. www.avg.com
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
+1
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Michael Everson everson@evertype.com wrote:
I reiterate my approval.
On 1 Dec 2017, at 15:58, Oliver Stegen oliver_stegen@sil.org wrote:
Thanks, Steve, for the reminder.
Last time, the discussion got sidetracked into discussing [grc] instead
of [lfn]. Hopefully, we'll stay on track this time.
I vote +1 for approving Lingua Franca Nova Wikipedia. (Still for the
same arguments which swayed me in February, particularly Jan's and Michael's posts.)
Oliver
On 01-Dec-17 15:57, Steven White wrote:
I would like to get this decided definitively. Based on the discussion
thread on the subject that started January 31 and went into February, it seems to me that LangCom was leaning favorably toward this project. However, that discussion thread was not closed definitively, so I'd ask for that to happen now. Thank you.
Steven
Sent from Outlook
Virus-free. www.avg.com
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Hoi, I am in favour as well. Samuel is not a member of the committee so it is now three in favour. Thanks, GerardM
On 6 December 2017 at 12:49, Michael Everson everson@evertype.com wrote:
That’s three in favour… _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom