1. (previously (3) ) I would go with SIL's expertise with the languages of New Guinea. It looks like the Solomonic solution for our needs.
2. I agree with Michael that it's hard to find such areal experts, that we are need for Southeast Asian languages, meaning that I would go with asking André Müller to join us.
If nobody objects two proposals above, I would conclude them on February 18th as our decision.
3. (previously (1) ) We still need an areal expert and hopefully Wikimedian and hopefully a native person for Central and South American languages. If we have no better idea till February 18th, I would publish our request on wikimedia-l.
Am 11.02.2017 5:39 vorm. schrieb "Milos Rancic" millosh@gmail.com:
1. (previously (3) ) I would go with SIL's expertise with the languages of New Guinea. It looks like the Solomonic solution for our needs.
2. I agree with Michael that it's hard to find such areal experts, that we are need for Southeast Asian languages, meaning that I would go with asking André Müller to join us.
If nobody objects two proposals above, I would conclude them on February 18th as our decision.
Is there anything to decide about point 1 at all? And if point 2 is a proposal for a new member, can we have an explicit thread about it (or make this one into it).
3. (previously (1) ) We still need an areal expert and hopefully Wikimedian and hopefully a native person for Central and South American languages. If we have no better idea till February 18th, I would publish our request on wikimedia-l.
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:25 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Is there anything to decide about point 1 at all?
No, but it was just an information, which differs from what I previously proposed.
And if point 2 is a proposal for a new member, can we have an explicit thread about it (or make this one into it).
OK, will separate it.