Two requests have come to my attention which we should reject: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz... Apparently, these languages are not written in Latin script. There is also, of course, no extra ISO code for "Romanized" versions of them. In any case, no separate wikis are justified for them.
They do say " Romanized Pashto is also used by the Pashtun diaspora living outside their ancestor region central and south Asia."
IANA uses script codes along with language codes to indicate different orthographies.
On 6 Oct 2013, at 22:55, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Two requests have come to my attention which we should reject: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz... Apparently, these languages are not written in Latin script. There is also, of course, no extra ISO code for "Romanized" versions of them. In any case, no separate wikis are justified for them. _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
One could look into script conversion for ps.wikipedia.org. Am 07.10.2013 06:17 schrieb "Michael Everson" everson@evertype.com:
They do say " Romanized Pashto is also used by the Pashtun diaspora living outside their ancestor region central and south Asia."
IANA uses script codes along with language codes to indicate different orthographies.
On 6 Oct 2013, at 22:55, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Two requests have come to my attention which we should reject:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz...
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Romaniz...
Apparently, these languages are not written in Latin script. There is
also, of course, no extra ISO code for "Romanized" versions of them. In any case, no separate wikis are justified for them.
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom