Hoi,
In an alternate universe maybe.
Thanks,
GerardM
Op za 9 dec. 2017 om 13:24 schreef Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com>
I've just said that Klingon makes more sense than LFN, as it actually
has
native speakers.
On Dec 9, 2017 06:55, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> We had Klingon at one time.. Do you really consider revisiting that ?
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 8 December 2017 at 23:22, Milos Rancic <millosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:58 PM, MF-Warburg
>> <mfwarburg(a)googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Can we, by the way, define more detailed criteria for which
>> > artificial
>> > languages should be eligible?
>>
>> Agreed. If we count native speakers, Klingon is, AFAIK, immediately
>> after Esperanto.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org