Hoi,
Given that we have a problem in the basic functioning of the committee,
we'd better find a working relation because that went to pot. You may have
taken the role of clerk but without a modus vivendi things will bog down
even more. We do not need to accept this case, we have to function and we
clearly do not.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 10 December 2017 at 18:29, Steven White <koala19890(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
I cannot agree to stopping the clock. By all means let
this be motivation
to clarify policy and procedures for conlangs going forward. (I have some
thoughts on that to share later.)
But one of the reasons I took on the role of clerk is because so many
requests (opening and closing) have been in stasis for months and years,
sometimes notwithstanding policy. And I'm really trying to keep things
moving consistent with the current rules. So since this project passed
according to the current rules, we need to accept that in this case and
create the wiki.
Steven
Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom