Wikisource is not quite related to this thread, which is about Wikiversity.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2017-04-17 14:24 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, So far I have argued that when an organisation wants to support a Wikisource for its language, on the strength of that organisation and particularly as we have good instances of such cooperation in India we should allow for the existence of a Wikisource and not be as stubbornly apply the rules for a second project.
Wikisource helps editors and is not so much a project that is visited by readers. Thanks, GerardM
On 17 April 2017 at 13:02, Michael Everson everson@evertype.com wrote:
On 16 Apr 2017, at 07:41, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
At that I am on the record that the language committee should ease up
on the creation of new Wikisources particularly when there is institutional support for a Wikisource in a language.
What do you mean by “ease up on”?
Michael _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom