Hoi,

So far I have argued that when an organisation wants to support a Wikisource for its language, on the strength of that organisation and particularly as we have good instances of such cooperation in India we should allow for the existence of a Wikisource and not be as stubbornly apply the rules for a second project.

Wikisource helps editors and is not so much a project that is visited by readers.

Thanks,

       GerardM

On 17 April 2017 at 13:02, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> wrote:

On 16 Apr 2017, at 07:41, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At that I am on the record that the language committee should ease up on the creation of new Wikisources particularly when there is institutional support for a Wikisource in a language.

What do you mean by “ease up on”?

Michael

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom