Unfortunately, there is not very much activity: < https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/?title=Georgian&cat=1&wik...
About interface translations, core and the 2 Wikisource-specific extensions are nearly complete and there is also activity on TWN < https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:TranslationStats&languag...; that seems OK to me.
2015-11-30 22:59 GMT+01:00 Antony Green toniogreen@web.de:
I support the approval of Georgian Wikisource.
Am 2015-11-30 um 21:26 schrieb Amir E. Aharoni:
Yes, let's approve them.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2015-11-30 16:53 GMT+02:00 Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com:
Yes, from "Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee"... My Gmail has taken this description by default from somebody...
So, first, MF-Warburg says Georgian Wikisource should go regularly.
I suggest Neapolitan Wikisource should go fast forward.
And I suggest we amend the rules which would say something like "After the first project created, community can get Wikisource at any point of time." -- or whatever appropriate.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, You are not. My bad, it shows as wikimedia, I thought it was wikimedia-l Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 15:24, Milos Rancic < millosh@gmail.com
millosh@gmail.com> wrote:
Gerard, we are talking here via the list langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
langcom@lists.wikimedia.org. Am I
missing something?
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The right mailing list is the mailing list of the language committee.
All
its members are subscribed to that one. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 November 2015 at 14:14, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, MF-Warburg <
mfwarburg@googlemail.com>
wrote: > > I don't understand. If ka.ws fulfills the activity requirements,
it can
> be approved. Did anyone check it already?
No :) I am a bit out of regular LangCom duties, so I actually asked
that
inside of the first email.
On the other side, I do think we should make WS requests approval
much
quicker, as in the most of the new requests, it will be used for
language
preservation.
Gerard, may you explain what do you think with "It is the wrong mailinglist for that." What's the right method to discuss this in
your
opinion?
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing listLangcom@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green WE 1703 Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 10369 Berlin Germany
E-mail: toniogreen@web.de Phone: +49-30-34 50 98 97 Mobile: +49-176-82 29 59 20
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom