At one point LangCom had said that a language which has successfully applied for one project can have any following ones without problems (provided there is a community for it which takes care of it). And of course, we do have a Simple English wikipedia. However, in this particular case, I don't think that the "second projects granted" rule should apply as the very existence of simple:wp is an exception in the first place. So, I vote for rejection on this. Oliver
On 06-Feb-16 12:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, I totally agree. Thanks, GerardM
On 5 February 2016 at 16:59, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com mailto:mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
There is a proposal at <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Simple_English> IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no ISO code). _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom