At one point LangCom had said that a language which has successfully applied for one project can have any following ones without problems (provided there is a community for it which takes care of it). And of course, we do have a Simple English wikipedia. However, in this particular case, I don't think that the "second projects granted" rule should apply as the very existence of simple:wp is an exception in the first place.
So, I vote for rejection on this.
Oliver

On 06-Feb-16 12:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I totally agree.
Thanks,
     GerardM

On 5 February 2016 at 16:59, MF-Warburg <mfwarburg@googlemail.com> wrote:
IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no ISO code).


_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom




_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom