The proposal exactly is that the eligibility of such languages should be decided by a (simple majority) vote. Or do I misunderstand the objection?
2017-05-19 3:32 GMT+02:00 Michael Everson everson@evertype.com:
I agree with Gerard. A primary code in BPC 47 would be a rarity, and not something to be adopted here without a proper vote.
Michael Everson
On 19 May 2017, at 01:24, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
I do not support the Notion of a simple majority When there is no ISO639
- I want arguments and eventualy a vote.
Thanks, GerardM
Op vr 19 mei 2017 om 01:08 schreef MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com Forgot one important point:
:''Eligibility of a language without a valid ISO 639-3 code, but with a
valid BCP 47 code.''
This would be a novelty.
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom