Hoi, The two week period is for when we inform the board that we have come to a conclusion and that they may object within the two week time frame. When someone of the committee objects, it is a no. Thanks, GerardM
On 25 January 2017 at 21:39, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
No, that means it's outside of the "discussion" phase and that LangCom has taken the request for verification. We could decide to reject a proposal (for example, the second request for Dalmatian is likely to be rejected and it's marked as "doing").
We basically need two weeks (am I right?) for the proposal to become a decision. So, all current non-trivial requests (that I've already marked as eligible or rejected) belong to that category for the next 10-15 days.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
Good idea, thanks for doing that! I'd I understand it right it's for
cases
where all criteria are (mostly) met, but we need to get external exists, right?
- jan. 2017 21:32 skrev "Milos Rancic" millosh@gmail.com:
Inside of the template for "lc-row" [1], used on the page Requests for new languages [2], I've added the type of official status "Verification ongoing" which would be invoked by typing "doing" into the "status" field.
I think it's pretty plain and useful for both ourselves and those waiting for our decision. It should cover the period from adding a proposal for discussion and final decision. If there is no final decision, it should be rolled back into "discussion" status.
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Lc-row [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom