Gerard,
Please concentrate on interacting with voting LangCom members more than on replying to unhelpful accusations by observers. Both Michael and I have asked you to make concrete suggestions about how you want LangCom to move forward and avoid the current impasse caused by your veto.
Looking forward to your *concrete* suggestions, Oliver
On 08-May-15 12:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, Who says that I am doing anything and what do you base it on that I am wasting time?
You are wrong and I have my reasons. Thanks, GerardM
On 8 May 2015 at 09:58, Mjbmr <mjbmri@gmail.com mailto:mjbmri@gmail.com> wrote:
Any language member can veto such a highly decision, but if he doesn't do anything and wasting the time, other langcom member better decide. btw, that's why iso639-3 is for, there is no need to discuss this with az project to see if they will allow creation of azb project. On 5/8/2015 11:42 AM, Oliver Stegen wrote:Gerard, I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some issues seem to be impossible to discuss by email. Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's try again by this imperfect medium riddled with potential misunderstandings ... *sigh* How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I understand that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate with each other in writing. The recent crisis has shown that the az community is deeply divided. For most LangCom members that seems to be enough evidence to split az wikipedia in two. LangCom has the mandate to make such decisions. Please make a constructive proposal asap so that LangCom will not be accused again to delay urgent matters. Thanks. Oliver On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:Hoi, A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on it. So I am dead against without clarification what the az wikipedia wants. Not having this feedback I reserve judgement until a later date. Thanks, GerardM On 7 May 2015 at 22:08, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com <mailto:everson@evertype.com>> wrote: On 7 May 2015, at 10:05, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com <mailto:gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>> wrote: > Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one affects another. There obvious parallels and I do not want this to be an excuse. Answer my questions. Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what form? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom