No, I can only see it in the multilingual Wikisource, with only 20 pages.
I'm not sure that will they have much in the public domain area, given that the language was only standardized in the 1920s, but Cyrillic versions of older Persian works as they are studied in Tajikistan are legitimate.
In any case, yes, it's uncontroversially eligible.
בתאריך 27 במאי 2017 19:23, "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com כתב:
Hoi, It is because there is already a Tajik Wikisource. Thanks, GerardM
On 27 May 2017 at 18:18, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
I'm marking Tajik Wikisource [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wi ki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Tajik] eligible as well; it seems uncontroversial to me.
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin, Germany E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom