If we can count Michael's comment about the orthography as an expert confirmation, then let's approve it.
If not, we need to find another expert.
I'd be liberal and say Yes, let's approve.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2016-04-25 14:09 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, The question is not only if it is eligible ... we agree that it is. The question is what needs to be done to reach the final stage. Thanks, GerardM
On 21 April 2016 at 20:12, Antony Green toniogreen@web.de wrote:
I agree, it's eligible.
Am 2016-04-21 um 15:13 schrieb Michael Everson:
On 21 Apr 2016, at 05:15, Oliver Stegen oliver_stegen@sil.org wrote:
If we're talking about Patois (ISO code jam), then it's definitely a valid language. I vote for accepting it.
I’ve looked at it and it’s just the same orthography I’ve published in http://www.evertype.com/books/alice-jam.html
This is definitely good to go.
Michael Everson _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- Dr. Antony Green Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 WE 1703 10369 Berlin E-Mail: toniogreen@web.de Mobile: +49-176-82295920
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom