In general, I look at the activity overview on Catanalysis [1]. Here there were only 27 edits by one user in this month, and 3 edits by others. In May, only 3 edits by users and one by CommonsDelinker (a bot which updates links to files from Commons). This doesn't really meet the criteria from policy[2], "At least five active users must edit that language regularly before a test project will be considered successful." It does also not meet the less-strict criteria listed on the request page[3], which we usually use ("It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.").
Additionally, we need to check the translation of the interface: It's not yet complete[4], so we check the translation activity [5] - this would seem ok to me if the Incubator activity was high enough as well.
[1] https://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/catanalysis/?cat=0&title=wy/id&w... [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LPP#Verification [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikivoyage_Indone... [4] http://toolserver.org/~robin/?tool=codelookup&code=id [5] http://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&limit=500&a...
2013/6/30 Antony Green toniogreen@web.de
I got a comment on my Meta talkpage asking if Indonesian Wikivoyagehttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikivoyage_Indonesianis ready to be approved. I'm not really up to speed on how to evaluate Incubator projects for approvability, so could someone take a look and see if it's ready to go?
Thanks, Antony
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom