I am all for lowering criteria to 200 messages for all. May we conclude that we will change the policy that way? On Mar 11, 2015 7:32 PM, "MF-Warburg" mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
This is not formalistic nonsense, but fair rules which are the same for everyone. Am 11.03.2015 18:29 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen" gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi. I am increasingly frustrated by this formalistic nonsense. Yes you can object but what do you achieve ? Nothing at all, you are impeding where an organisation indicates that it will do what is needed when the project is live.
Frustration means not as much involvement. That is what it does to me. Thanks, GerardM
On 11 March 2015 at 16:18, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
On the very same page I see 594 messages in total in that group, 286 thereof still to translate. Am 11.03.2015 16:08 schrieb "Santhosh Thottingal" < santhosh.thottingal@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:32 PM, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
No, for the first project in a language, as it is the case here, the 500 most-used messages should be translated.
translatewiki.net stats page https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=Special:LanguageStats&language=gom-deva&group=core-0-mostused says 592 most-used messages translated.
Santhosh
Langcom-l mailing list Langcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
Langcom-l mailing list Langcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
Langcom-l mailing list Langcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l
Langcom-l mailing list Langcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom-l