They’re now charging something like 400 a year.
On 5 Nov 2019, at 15:21, Steven White Koala19890@hotmail.com wrote:
Ethnologue does not cover artificial, historical or ancient languages—only living and extinct languages. "Extinct" in this setting is the ISO 639–3 sense: gone extinct in the last few centuries.
Speaking of Ethnologue, I can't get three page views a month any more, even wiping cookies. What's up with that? Can anyone help us get some limited access?
Steven
Sent from Outlook
From: Langcom langcom-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Amir E. Aharoni amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 7:24 AM To: Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee langcom@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Langcom] Kotava Wikipedia
Well... As it was with Lingua Franca Nova: I'm somewhat skeptical about the usefulness of this project and about the future activity once the founders lose interest, but I'm not really opposed to it.
I was also a bit skeptical about the validity of the code, because it doesn't appear on Ethnologue. But it does appear at https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/avk , so I guess it's OK.
-- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
בתאריך יום ג׳, 5 בנוב׳ 2019 ב-14:12 מאת Jon Harald Søby <jhsoby@gmail.com>: Any other comments other than Michael's repeated approvals? ;-)
If not, we can move forward on this, but I'd like to hear the thoughts of at least a couple more committee members.
tir. 1. okt. 2019 kl. 15:28 skrev Michael Everson everson@evertype.com: There seems to be something wrong with my mail server.
On 30 Sep 2019, at 20:33, MF-Warburg mfwarburg@googlemail.com wrote:
Michael, are you ok?
Michael Everson everson@evertype.com schrieb am Mo., 30. Sep. 2019, 21:24: I support approval.
On 26 Sep 2019, at 22:47, Jon Harald Søby jhsoby@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to hear your thoughts on the Kotava Wikipedia. Kotava is a conlang created in 1978, mainly known in French-speaking countries (according to the English Wikipedia). They have a very active test wiki in Incubator, with more than 3,000 articles, which makes it bigger than the Novial Wikipedia (which we approved in 2008) and about the same size as the Lingua Franca Nova (LFN) Wikipedia (which we approved in 2017). There are several active users, and sustained activity for many months.
Does anyone have reasons for why we should not approve this project?
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
-- mvh Jon Harald Søby _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom