Hoi,
A lot may have been discussed in Berlin but this was not communicated
afterwards .. So no.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 December 2017 at 14:52, Steven White <Koala19890(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Jon Harald, I think I was told at one point that
this was discussed in
Berlin, and would be acceptable for the purpose of helping to support this
project in an Australian aboriginal language. But as I was not in Berlin,
I'd like some LangCom member who was there to confirm this.
Gnangarra, other than with respect to that question, it looks like things
are ready by the numbers: decent number of pages, not mostly stubs, "most
used" translation complete, sufficient activity. Here was my main
concern: In my random check of pages, I found some BLP pages that I was
not entirely comfortable with. Now, I can appreciate that there may be
personalities you want to highlight in this project that are mostly notable
within the context of the community, rather than at large. But there are
still good reasons that BLP requires reliable sourcing, and I thought some
of the BLP pages I saw were kind of shaky in that regard. I don't think I'd
withhold project approval for that, but between now and project creation,
and then in the first year of the new wiki, I'd really want to see some of
that tightened up.
Steven
Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom(a)lists.wikimedia.org