On Sep 29, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Ian Tresman wrote:
Ah. It appears quite a lot of it is explained here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/ Pseudoscience Probation, repeated violations, apparent inability to work with others. Appeal to the arbitration committee is the way back.
Yes, that's where I was found guilty of having an "orientation", and an Arbitrator condoned the use of incivility with Ad hominems against me. Again, no examples of improper editing.
I suggest you re-read it. Look for "low level edit warring and frequent edits against consensus", under the heading "Iantresman's editing style".
-Ronabop