Hoi,
I will be happy to see that you are right once the message files exist.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 3/5/07, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not protesting it, I am simply saying that obviously nobody is
aware of this requirement.
The people who are working on these projects are very dedicated, if
they knew that this requirement existed, you can be sure that it would
be fixed right away.
Mark
On 05/03/07, GerardM <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
We are now at the stage where we have a policy. We are not interested in
talking the proposal to death. We are first going to see how it
functions.
When we find that it does not work, we will tweak
things carefully. The
lack
of having message files for all languages is one
of the major
shortcomings
in the current localisation procedures.
You may think of it as a technicality or not fair. The point is that the
developers proved to be unwilling to remedy things in the past (for
instance
for Marathi). The only consequence can be that
new projects have to
have message
files from the start. It is not fair to start new languages that are
incomplete; it is not fair to require the localisation to be done again
when
a new project is requested in the same language.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 3/5/07, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not complaining about be.wp, I know that is a difficult situation
> and I do not expect that it can be resolved soon.
>
> It doesn't appear that anybody told any of these people that they are
> required to have a message file.
>
> These requests are simply sitting there, nobody has actually told
> these people "We do not see ____, when you get that we will proceed
> further with considerations for your Wiki."
>
> These people are very dedicated, I am sure if anyone had actually told
> them what exactly it is that they need to do to move forward, they
> would do it right away. I am sure the messages file would be
> translated into Kabyle, for example, in less than a week, if anyone
> had ever actually informed those people that it is needed.
>
> - Wls - if there is "no reasonable support", the number of speakers is
> entirely irrelevant, of course the project is not viable since it has
> 0 articles in the incubator and nobody currently asking for its
> creation (there was only one person who did).
> - Twd - this case needs to be probed further to see how much Twents
> people would support it as a Wiki separate from nds-nl. There are
> already over two hundred articles in it, but the majority are at
> nds-nl.wp. User:Tubantia indicated preliminary support of such a
> request some time ago, so it needs to be re-investigated to see if
> this is a viable project or not, and whether the needs of
> Twents-speakers are currently being surved by our existing project
> (nds-nl)
> - Stq - this is obviously a viable project. There is support of native
> speakers, many many pages and very active on the incubator. So you
> want a message file. Why didn't you tell the people working on this
> project? I am sure they would prepare it in several days.
> - Pfl - this project appears to still be in the early stages of
> incubator development. At this point in time, I don't expect it to be
> approved by anyone.
> - Lld - same as pfl, except I do not expect its development soon.
> Someone needs to investigate how well existing users are served by
> rm.wp and fur.wp.
> - Kok - although this is a major language of India with millions of
> speakers, it is a problem that there are currently no articles. I'm
> sure Frederick Noronha could remedy this, though; in the meantime, I
> agree and do not think it would be reasonable to approve the project.
> - Kab - same as stq.
>
> Others you failed to mention:
>
> - Bat-ltg/lv-ltg - same situation as stq.
> - Crh - same situation as stq.
> - Dsb - same situation as stq.
>
> It seems that if your rules mean that these Wikis are not able to be
> created now, it is not necessarily the case that there is no
> opposition (although it may be), the case currently is that _nobody
> knows about the rules_. When you have a new policy with as much impact
> as this one, it is imperative that it be solicited to all the persons
> and communities to whom it is relevant, and their opinion awaited.
> This is a Wiki, I am sure that even people who support the policy will
> have suggestions for its improvement, but so far very few have shown
> up because you have not advertised it much.
>
> Mark
>
> On 05/03/07, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mark Williamson schreef:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Perhaps some of you are aware of the formation of the Langcom.
> > >
> > > Also, you may be aware of the recent reform of the language
proposal
> process.
> > >
> > > However, what you may not be aware of is that the Language
Committee
> > > is taking a while to actually get
underway and to the point where
they
> > > can excersise control over the
creation of new Wikis.
> > >
> > > Despite that, it seems that they are already looked to as an
authority
> > > in this area, while they do not
act as such.
> > >
> > > There are several new Wikipedia requests which were
uncontroversial
> > > when first posed. Many of dozens
of voices of support, and have
> > > thriving tests on the Incubator.
> > >
> > > However, their requests were deleted by PathosChild who said that
they
> > > would have to remake them, which
they have. So far, no proposals
for
> > > Wikipedias in new languages have
been _approved_ under the new
> > > proposal process, despite its having been around for several
months
> > > now. They just sit there. And sit
there. And sit there some more.
> > >
> > > I think it's about time something happened. I think it's about
time we
> > > welcomed these people -- the
Kabyles, the Latgalians, the Lower
> > > Sorbians, the Crimeans, and all the others -- into our Wikipedia
> > > family. They have waited long enough. Why can't somebody do
something?
> > > Why do they have to wait for the
langcom to get underway? For all
we
> > > know, that could take years.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > Hoi,
> > The language committee has proposed things. It does not have the
power
> > to force issues. We are now at the
stage where we have published our
> > guidelines. We have given warning that we do adopt these guidelines
as
a
> > rule if there was no indication of
opposition to this. This has not
> > happened. From our POV the rules as we published them apply.
> >
> > All projects for a new language that do not have a work in progress
in
> > the Incubator are denied. Starting in
the Incubator is mandatory.
> > Working on the localisation is a strong factor in favour for
granting a
> > new language a project.
> >
> > We have some questions outstanding with the board; particularly
about
> > the Belarus Wikipedia. In our opinion
only the official Belarus
> > Wikipedia has the right to the be.wikipedia label. We have asked at
> > least a month ago for a resolution of this issue from the board. We
do
> > not want to take up new things that
much if open things do not get
> > resolved. It is a waste of our time otherwise.
> >
> > We have already denied one proposal for an artificial languages that
has
> > no wide support. That one was obvious.
> >
> > *The wls project has no reasonable amount of support at the moment,
> > there are only 29,768 people speaking it .. Is this a reasonable
> proposal ?
> > *The twd project has no reasonable amount of support at the moment,
> > there is not even an estimation how many people are speaking it ..
Is
> > this a reasonable proposal ?
> > *The stq project does not have a message file.. so we cannot assess
the
> > localisation of the messages
> > *The pfl project does not have a message file.. so we cannot assess
the
> > localisation of the messages. There are
insufficient articles of a
> > sufficient length.
> > *The lld project does not have a message file.. so we cannot assess
the
> > localisation of the messages. There are
insufficient articles of a
> > sufficient length.
> > *The kok project does not have a message file.. so we cannot assess
the
> > localisation of the messages. There are
no articles
> > *The kab project does not have a message file.. so we cannot assess
the
> > localisation of the messages.
> >
> > So basically from our point of view, it seems that the message files
are
> not
there. They are required.
>
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikipedia-l mailing list
> Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
>
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org