Rig? No. I just deleted votes that were invalid, like Pavel did.
Really? Your rules were that every account made before the vote is valid. Why did you delete my vote? BTW, your attempt to justify this by changing the rules of the vote *after* the vote ended was pitiful. This can be checked, and I provided the link in my initial post:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2006-June/044508.html
And the limited number is not currently 0. You have not been following this discussion for very long. Please take a look at the archives. You have accused me of arguing on topics I am not familiar with, now you are being a hypocrite.
Actually, I'm following this *very* closely. Could you, please, tell me who these editors are? And don't start with "I have said it before". This is your favourite excuse. Just list some user names.
:en:Dpotop
Mark
On 30/06/06, Jacky PB dpotop1@yahoo.com wrote:
Hm, interesting, so you want another criterion to measure the "genuine interest" in mo.wikipedia.
Then, I suggest some rules for this measurement:
- Take into account only hits to actual articles (main namespace) having more than 5 lines of
text.
Otherwise said, the articles copied from the Romanian wikipedia.
- Make the measurement on a period when there was no full-scale revert war (for instance, before
the
current one started).
- Do not count IPs of Romanian wikipedia users,
nor
IPs of Russian wikipedia users. These users
(like
me) are just inspecting mo.wikipedia to spot the current status of the revert war (it's full scale and never stops). One week ago, for
instance,
Mark (User:Node_ue) tried to organize, and then
rig
some elections to get back his sysop status (he
has
been desysopped some time ago for bad
behavior).
If you think you can do this, then ask yourself
what
this measures. Remember: you cannot assume that
the
traffic has the same structure here as in en.wikipedia.
Yours, Dpotop
--- mboverload mboverload@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm actually interested in is the number of hits on that wikipedia.
mboverload
On 6/30/06, Jacky PB dpotop1@yahoo.com wrote:
But you are not Moldovan. You are not able
to
write Moldovan.
You pretend helping some people that did not
ask
for your help.
No native Moldovan expressed an interest in
your
wikipedia.
I am Moldovan. It is your _opinion_ that I am
"not
able to write
Moldovan", especially given that you attach no
adverb. "Native
Moldovans" (assuming you mean Moldovans living
in
Moldova) have
expressed an interest, although in very
limited
numbers.
The "limited number" is currently 0. :)
And anyone can check this by looking at the
number
of users registered
(with Babel) as speakers of Moldovan (code
mo). On
the whole wikipedia,
there is a single "mo" user, which is Mark,
a.k.a.
User:Node_ue. And he's
level mo-2, meaning that he's making basic
grammar
and spelling errors.
:en:Dpotop
Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new
Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- Refije dirije lanmè yo paske nou posede pwòp bato. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com