Kat Walsh wrote:
snip<
So it's two email addresses that would need to be confirmed... until single user login is implemented. (This is really coming, right? Right?) I don't see that as an unreasonable barrier. As for "unnecessary" -- well, the project hasn't fallen apart thus far without, but there are a lot of unnecessary things that are still a win.
IIRC having a confirmed email address will prove to be highly useful when the single login approaches, as some sort of proof that the same person owns the various accounts to which they might lay claim.
So we ought to be promoting this in any case...
HTH HAND